by Patrick Burns.
Abstract: Problems with performance measurement using information ratios relative to a benchmark are exposed. Random portfolios (that obey constraints but disregard utility) are shown to measure investment skill effectively. Investment mandates can also be based on random portfolios — this allows active fund managers more freedom to implement their ideas, and provides the investor more flexibility to gain utility. The issue of the proper attitude towards tracking error is broached, but left largely undecided. There is also a critique of Fisher’s method of combining p-values that shows Stouffer’s method to be preferable.
This version: 2004 December 02 (pdf)
A revised version of this with some additional material appears as ”Random Portfolios for Performance Measurement” in Optimisation, Econometric and Financial Analysis E. Kontoghiorghes and C. Gatu, editors. Springer.
jun 25, 26
Online Math Degrees has a page of ”100 savvy sites on statistics and quantitative analysis”. It has some that you recognize, some that you’ve hardly ever heard of. The sites [...]
jun 25, 26
R is a piece of software, but it is also a community. Help community The most visible aspect of the R community is help. This is also the most useful [...]
jun 25, 26
Some history and a prediction. Past A discussion broke out on the R-help mailing list in January 2006 about a technical report put out by the statistical computing group at [...]