by Patrick Burns.

Abstract: The current practice of fund management can be altered to improve the lot of both the investor and the fund manager. Tracking error constraints in mandates can be replaced by an evaluation of the added value provided to the investor by the fund manager. The value of the manager depends not only on the outperformance of the manager’s fund, but also on its volatility and its correlation to the rest of the investor’s portfolio. Hyperpassive funds — an approach suggested by the new mandate scheme — show promise.

This version: 2003 November 17 (pdf)

Kommentarer inaktiverade för Sharper Fund Management

See more

Explore more content and blog posts.

  • jun 25, 26

    Online Math Degrees has a page of ”100 savvy sites on statistics and quantitative analysis”.  It has some that you recognize, some that you’ve hardly ever heard of. The sites [...]

  • jun 25, 26

    R is a piece of software, but it is also a community. Help community The most visible aspect of the R community is help.  This is also the most useful [...]

  • jun 25, 26

    Some history and a prediction. Past A discussion broke out on the R-help mailing list in January 2006 about a technical report put out by the statistical computing group at [...]