Main points:

  • the history of random portfolios extends at least to Chicago 1965
  • testing a fund versus a benchmark takes many years to get reasonable statistical power
  • a benchmark will be easier to beat some years versus others
  • peer groups depend on the fantasy that there is little noise in the rankings of the peers
  • there are open probability questions about random portfolios
  • random portfolios are sometimes used like the statistical bootstrap, sometimes like a random permutation test

annotated slides (pdf)

Presented 2009 April at the R/Finance Conference

Kommentarer inaktiverade för Random Portfolios: Practice and Theory

See more

Explore more content and blog posts.

  • jun 25, 26

    Several packages on CRAN provide (or relate to) interfaces between databases and R.  Here is a summary, mostly in the words of the package descriptions.  Remember that package names are [...]

  • jun 25, 26

    Chapter 32 of Tao Te Programming advises you to make bricks instead of monoliths.  Here is an example. The example is written with the syntax of R and is a [...]

  • jun 25, 26

    There is a mechanism that allows variability in the arguments given to R functions.  Technically it is ellipsis, but more commonly called ”…”, dots, dot-dot-dot or three-dots. Basics The three-dots [...]