Main points:
- the history of random portfolios extends at least to Chicago 1965
- testing a fund versus a benchmark takes many years to get reasonable statistical power
- a benchmark will be easier to beat some years versus others
- peer groups depend on the fantasy that there is little noise in the rankings of the peers
- there are open probability questions about random portfolios
- random portfolios are sometimes used like the statistical bootstrap, sometimes like a random permutation test
Presented 2009 April at the R/Finance Conference
Kommentarer inaktiverade för Random Portfolios: Practice and Theory
jun 25, 26
Programmers think programming is really hard. Non-programmers think it’s even harder than that. Figure 1: The perceived difficulty of programming. Why is programming so arduous? […]
jun 25, 26
Coordinates: 2014 September 15-17 in the London borough of #rstats. 15th, evening I had just the right number of R bugs so that I could walk to the drinks and arrive [...]
jun 25, 26
Navigation gets you from where you are to where you want to be. Speaking of navigation, you can jump to selected sections of this post: Navigation; R-bloggers; Task views; Rdocumentation.org; [...]