by Patrick Burns.
Abstract: Realized tracking errors are examined for a series of optimized portfolios using various estimates for the variance matrix. It is clear that the benchmark should be added mathematically to the variance matrix using the constituent weights — this dramatically outperforms the case where the benchmark is a separate asset in the return matrix or where relative returns are used. The common belief that factor models are to be preferred to sample variance estimates is confirmed, but only on condition that the benchmark is added mathematically to the variance matrix.
This version: 2003 May 06 (pdf)
See also the blog post ”How to add a benchmark to a variance matrix”.
jun 25, 26
I’d like to do a song of great social and political import. The code that created the illustrations in Tao Te Programming is now available as the TaoTeProgramming package on [...]
jun 25, 26
Another of the all ye entering here. Issue When subscripting an xts object, columns that don’t exist in the object are silently ignored. Example First, create an xts object: xtx [...]
jun 25, 26
Posts by page views Interview with a forced convert to R from Matlab A first step towards R from spreadsheets Plot ranges of data in R A statistical review of [...]