by Patrick Burns.
Abstract: Realized tracking errors are examined for a series of optimized portfolios using various estimates for the variance matrix. It is clear that the benchmark should be added mathematically to the variance matrix using the constituent weights — this dramatically outperforms the case where the benchmark is a separate asset in the return matrix or where relative returns are used. The common belief that factor models are to be preferred to sample variance estimates is confirmed, but only on condition that the benchmark is added mathematically to the variance matrix.
This version: 2003 May 06 (pdf)
See also the blog post ”How to add a benchmark to a variance matrix”.
jun 25, 26
The function in question is scriptSearch. I’m not much for superlatives — ”most” and ”best” imply one dimension, but we live in a multi-dimensional world. I’m making an exception. The [...]
jun 25, 26
I recently gave a talk at the R in Finance conference in which I introduced the marketAgent package for R. Here is the source for the package if you'd like [...]
jun 25, 26
Executive summary Surprisingly good. And it’s not like my expectations were especially low. Structure There are 20 chapters. I mostly like the chapters and their order. Hadley breaks the 20 chapters [...]