by Patrick Burns.
Abstract: Most likely you know of the stock market dartboard game: some reputed experts are pitted against a portfolio that was selected ”by throwing darts”. This makes compelling journalism — especially when the darts win — but is less than perfect science. However, a more rigorous version of this game is good science. The enhanced method generally goes by the name of ”random portfolios” or ”Monte Carlo simulation”. It has the power to radically transform the practice of fund management — a dart to the heart. We will start by taking a close look at performance measurement. We will then move on to some wider issues of fund management.
This version: 2007 March 08 (pdf)
A slightly edited version of this appeared in the March 2007 issue of Professional Investor under the title ”Bullseye”.
jun 25, 26
Several packages on CRAN provide (or relate to) interfaces between databases and R. Here is a summary, mostly in the words of the package descriptions. Remember that package names are [...]
jun 25, 26
Chapter 32 of Tao Te Programming advises you to make bricks instead of monoliths. Here is an example. The example is written with the syntax of R and is a [...]
jun 25, 26
There is a mechanism that allows variability in the arguments given to R functions. Technically it is ellipsis, but more commonly called ”…”, dots, dot-dot-dot or three-dots. Basics The three-dots [...]