by Patrick Burns.
Abstract: Most likely you know of the stock market dartboard game: some reputed experts are pitted against a portfolio that was selected ”by throwing darts”. This makes compelling journalism — especially when the darts win — but is less than perfect science. However, a more rigorous version of this game is good science. The enhanced method generally goes by the name of ”random portfolios” or ”Monte Carlo simulation”. It has the power to radically transform the practice of fund management — a dart to the heart. We will start by taking a close look at performance measurement. We will then move on to some wider issues of fund management.
This version: 2007 March 08 (pdf)
A slightly edited version of this appeared in the March 2007 issue of Professional Investor under the title ”Bullseye”.
jun 25, 26
How to have a better chance of a good outcome. Making mistakes There’s been a lot of talk recently about data analysis problems with spreadsheets. If you’ve not stuck your [...]
jun 25, 26
The AllTrials campaign is pushing for all data on drug trials to be made public -- see the campaign statement. If the public has all the evidence rather than a [...]
jun 25, 26
Here is an interview with Ron Hochreiter, Assistant Professor at WU Vienna University Economics and Business. In 25 words or less tell us what you do (using German words is [...]


